Saturday, January 21, 2006

now passes the midnight hour

ANCESTOR WILSON PICKETT
BORN
18th March 1941
Crossed over
19th January 2006
He
delivered
SOUL MUSIC
INTERNATIONALLY

may the ancestors be pleased with his efforts....

Friday, January 20, 2006

dual journeys





TWO JOURNEYS
ONE DESTINATION

WE GIVE THANKS FOR THE STRUGGLES OF SOJOURNER TRUTH AND NAT TURNER












WE POUR LIBATIONS
FOR THE NEXT
THREE DAYS IN
THEIR HONOUR


HOTEPH












Far in the future, I see man as Light-born, free from the darkness that fetters the Soul, living in Light without the bounds of the darkness to cover the Light that is Light of their Soul.
Know ye, O man, before ye attain this that many the dark shadows shall fall on your Light striving to quench with the shadows of darkness the Light of the Soul that strives to be free.
DJHEUITY



Thursday, January 19, 2006

Besieged Indigenous regent


A besieged Indigenous Regent
Queen LILLUOKALANI (1838-1917)
KAMEHAMEHA FEMALES LEAD FUNERAL OF THE QUEEN IN 1917


On 17 January 2006 in Hawaii, Queen Lilluokalani's regime was overthrown by pro-annexation sugar interests led by U.S. pineapple tycoon Sanford Dole . A provincial government was eventually installed with Dole as president.


Queen LILLUOKALANI


In the words of Queen LILLUOKALANI>

" About the 22d of January a paper was handed to me by Mr. Wilson, which, on examination, proved to be a purported act of abdication for me to sign. It had been drawn out for the men in power by their own lawyer, Mr. A. S. Hartwell, whom I had not seen until he came with others to see me sign it. The idea of abdicating never originated with me. I knew nothing at all about such a transaction until they sent to me, by the hands of Mr. Wilson, the insulting proposition written in abject terms. For myself, I would have chosen death rather than to have signed it; but it was represented to me that by my signing this paper all the persons who had been arrested, all my people now in trouble by reason of their love and loyalty towards me, would be immediately released. Think of my position, – sick, a lone woman in prison, scarcely knowing who was my friend, or who listened to my words only to betray me, without legal advice or friendly counsel, and the stream of blood ready to flow unless it was stayed by my pen.
My persecutors have stated, and at that time compelled me to state, that this paper was signed and acknowledged by me after consultation with my friends whose names appear at the foot of it as witnesses. Not the least opportunity was given to me to confer with any one; but for the purpose of making it appear to the outside world that I was under the guidance of others, friends who had known me well in better days were brought into the place of my imprisonment, and stood around to see a signature affixed by me.


When it was sent to me to read, it was only a rough draft. After I had examined it, Mr. Wilson called, and asked me if I were willing to sign it. I simply answered that I would see when the formal or official copy was shown me. On the morning of the 24th of January the official document was handed to me, Mr. Wilson making the remark, as he gave it, that he hoped I would not retract, that is, he hoped that I would sign the official copy.


Then the following individuals witnessed my subscription of the signature which was demanded of me: William G. Irwin, H. A. Widemann, Samuel Parker, S. Kalua Kookano, Charles B. Wilson, and Paul Neumann. The form of acknowledgment was taken by W. L. Stanley, Notary Public.


So far from the presence of these persons being evidence of a voluntary act on my part, was it not an assurance to me that they, too, knew that, unless I did the will of my jailers, what Mr. Neumann had threatened would be performed, and six prominent citizens immediately put to death. I so regarded it then, and I still believe that murder was the alternative. Be this as it may, it is certainly happier for me to reflect to-day that there is not a drop of the blood of my subjects, friends or foes, upon my soul.


When it came to the act of writing, I asked what would be the form of signature; to which I was told to sign, "Liliuokalani Dominis." This sounding strange to me, I repeated the question, and was given the same reply. At this I wrote what they dictated without further demur, the more readily for the following reasons.


Before ascending the throne, for fourteen years, or since the date of my proclamation as heir apparent, my official title had been simply Liliuokalani. Thus I was proclaimed both Princess Royal and Queen. Thus it is recorded in the archives of the government to this day. The Provisional Government nor any other had enacted any change in my name. All my official acts, as well as my private letters, were issued over the signature of Liliuokalani. But when my jailers required me to sign "Liliuokalani Dominis," I did as they commanded. Their motive in this as in other actions was plainly to humiliate me before my people and before the world. I saw in a moment, what they did not, that, even were I not complying under the most severe and exacting duress, by this demand they had overreached themselves. There is not, and never was, within the range of my knowledge, any such a person as Liliuokalani Dominis.


It is a rule of common law that the acts of any person deprived of civil rights have no force nor weight, either at law or in equity; and that was my situation. Although it was written in the document that it was my free act and deed, circumstances prove that it was not; it had been impressed upon me that only by its execution could the lives of those dear to me, those beloved by the people of Hawaii, be saved, and the shedding of blood be averted. I have never expected the revolutionists of 1887 and 1893 to willingly restore the rights notoriously taken by force or intimidation; but this act, obtained under duress, should have no weight with the authorities of the United States, to whom I appealed. But it may be asked, why did I not make some protest at the time, or at least shortly thereafter, when I found my friends sentenced to death and imprisonment? I did. There are those now living who have seen my written statement of all that I have recalled here. It was made in my own handwriting, on such paper as I could get, and sent outside of the prison walls and into the hands of those to whom I wished to state the circumstances under which that fraudulent act of abdication was procured from me. This I did for my own satisfaction at the time.


After those in my place of imprisonment had all affixed their signatures, they left, with the single exception of Mr. A. S. Hartwell. As he prepared to go, he came forward, shook me by the hand, and the tears streamed down his cheeks. This was a matter of great surprise to me. After this he left the room. If he had been engaged in a righteous and honorable action, why should he be affected? Was it the consciousness of a mean act which overcame him so? Mrs. Wilson, who stood behind my chair throughout the ceremony, made the remark that those were crocodile's tears. I leave it to the reader to say what were his actual feelings in the case ..."

MAY THE ANCESTORS BE PLEASED...WE POUR LIBATIONS

Monday, January 16, 2006

a borderless global village


First published in the Caribbean since 1995, Dialogue
[then known as Profile 96] has acquired a dedicated readership of over twelve thousand readers across the planet.

This journal specifically addresses issues relating to indigenous cultures and its impact on the post modern world.


dialogue
Winter 2005 Dec/ Spring 2006 Annual Issue



Editor-Publisher: Roi Kwabena

Contributors:
Lennox Raphael, Roy Mc Farlane, Mishu Barua, Cathy Perry, Marlon Kigonya, Jasmine Johnson, Julianna Varnai, Raphael Chikukwa, Dr. Tony Talbot, Dr. Phil Watson, Prof. Yusef Eradam, Habte Wold, Mariko Suzuki, Rootswoman, with features from Indigenous Bodies & other writers

Contents (selected)

• Muse of Maps Mounds, Muurs & Mysteries
• Two features on Rastafari beliefs & culture
• Discoveries in KUSH
• Marriage: the debate of Polygamy versus Monogamy
• Writers Without Borders
• Waiting for the Be(a)st
• Kush Debate
• Expectations of the African Union
• Rum Wars of the Caribbean
• Veteran Caribbean Pioneer: Henry Gunter
• Caribbean Original Island Names
• Who are Indigenous peoples?
• Seeing Ourselves- Art & Artists of Zimbabwe


Plus more
Stunning photography
Weblinks
Suggested reading
Featured Poets
New Books
Cover Stories

PDF copies available from editor

as the ancients have commanded



In 1877, Standing Bear and his people, the Ponca, were forcibly removed from their land in northern Nebraska and sent to Indian Territory. When they arrived they found that no provision for food or shelter had been made for them. As a result, a number of the tribe, including Standing Bear’s son, did not survive the harsh winter. In defiance of his relocation order, Standing Bear decided to return to his homeland in Nebraska with as many of his people as wished to go with him. They set out on foot, begging along the way for food and shelter. Near
the city of Omaha they stopped to visit their relatives, the Omaha people. Not long thereafter the Ponca were arrested and held by General George Crook. With the help of local Indian rights activists and, some say, General Crook himself, Standing Bear sued in U.S. District Court for his right to return home. Judge Elmer Dundy found in favor of Standing Bear, giving for the first time the rights of a U. S. citizen to a Native American.

may the ancestors be pleased with Standing Bear....



<